1. Preliminary remarks.
The reason why I finally decided to publish these crude, semi-intuitive theoretical considerations is that even these crude theories allowed:
1. To create patches for athletes.
2. To create a screen that blocks gravity force.
3. To create devices for receiving information from the future.
I'm not an academic scientist; I'm not interested in an academic career, titles, or awards. Therefore, I can publish my work in its raw form. I'm confident that I'll still be the first to launch a device with an antigravity screen into space.
2. The role of phenomenological theories in the study of new phenomena.
When scientists encounter a new phenomenon, their description often begins with constructing a phenomenological theory of it. Phenomenological theory is based not on understanding the internal mechanisms of a phenomenon, but on defining the relationships between its external, most important, and key parameters. It's important to understand that constructing a phenomenological theory requires identifying the key parameters of the phenomenon. Phenomenological theory merely formulates the relationship between these parameters, but does not describe the essence of this relationship or its origin. Phenomenological theory explains these relationships in terms that are clear and familiar to scientists at the time. Phenomenological theories typically provide good agreement with experimental data, sometimes predict new effects, and provide impetus and direction for further research and the construction of a more profound fundamental theory.
Examples of such theories include:
In electricity: the concept of electric current as a fluid with special properties. This fluid could flow through wet ropes and metal wires, could accumulate in blood vessels, and cause an involuntary physiological reaction in living organisms.
In atomic physics: the Rutherford-Bohr theory of the planetary model of the atom, which explained the spectral series of hydrogen-like atoms and introduced the concept of quantum transitions and wave motion within the atom.
Subsequently, such phenomenological theories are replaced by deeper fundamental theories that reveal the internal mechanisms that lead to the establishment of the relationships described in the phenomenological theory. Despite the naivety of many of the constructs in phenomenological theories, serious physicists highly value their contribution to physical science.
Now we will attempt to construct a phenomenological theory that will explain how the exchange of encrypted, private information manifests itself in the visible material world.
3. The role of phenomenological theories in the study of antigravity.
In the study of antigravity, the role of phenomenological theories is more important than in other cases. In other cases, a phenomenological theory is a preliminary stage in the development of a full-fledged theory. In antigravity, it is a conceptual shift.
The point is that we live in a spatial world. We observe and are interested in spatial effects. Therefore, any theoretical results must be expressed in a description of spatial effects and described by spatial equations.
But how can we move from information exchange to spatial relations?
4. Phenomenological theory for homotechnologies.
Homotechnology, in the study of paranormal phenomena and the development of homotechnologies, is based on the crypto-information paradigm of the Universe. However, the crypto-information paradigm cannot deny the material paradigm, so we need to find a way to transition from the more general crypto-information paradigm to its particular case, the paradigm of the material world.
In our opinion, this can be done through Lagrange formalism. According to this approach, any material system can be assigned a certain function, which in physics is called a Lagrange function. This material system then moves between time values t and t+Δt such that the integral of its Lagrange function has a minimal value.
The requirement for a minimum value for integral is reminiscent of the idea of the amount of information as the minimum number of digits necessary to describe a system.
Therefore, we can interpret integral as the amount of information describing the motion of a material system.
One thing must be understood. In the requirement to describe the world as information, we consider time to be a subjective factor. Meanwhile, in integral, in physics, time is an objective factor. This contradiction is resolved as follows. Since the information we are considering is open information for all observers, time must also be the same for everyone.
Now, to obtain the equations of motion for the system, we need to find the conditions under which integral will have a minimum value. To do this, we vary integral and, from the variation, obtain the necessary equations of motion for the system. If we then substitute the Lagrangian function of the system into these equations, we obtain the equations of motion for the system of the material world.
How to introduce closed information into this approach
Information is an additive quantity. Therefore, we can expect that closed information will simply be an additional term to integral.
(2)
But what form does the additional integral take?
According to the information concept, time is not an objective parameter independent of us. Time depends on the observer. And so the question arises of how to vary by time, and then how to calculate the integral (1).
In the information paradigm, only subjective time exists.
Time can only be objective for open information
Since open information reaches all objects equally, time is therefore the same for all objects. But this is not true for closed information
Therefore, in additional integrals will do variation differently.
In constructing our phenomenological theory of antigravity, we will proceed from the following considerations:
We want to preserve the Lagrange formalism.
1. The equations that will describe the motion of the system in the presence of crypto-information interaction must transform into the equations of physics known to us if the crypto-information interaction tends to zero.
2. We choose the Lagrangian formalism because the principle of least action, which postulates that a system moves in such a way that its action is minimal, closely resembles the understanding of the amount of information as the minimum number of symbols necessary to describe the changes that have occurred (the system's motion). This is consistent with our idea that the spatial representation of the material world does not exist objectively, but is merely a form of representation of open information. Since open information is open and identical for everyone, the material world also appears identical to everyone.
3. Based on this, we will assume that crypto-information interaction should lead to a change in the Lagrange function of the system, but the Lagrange equations should remain unchanged, since the derivation of the Lagrange equations is based on logic not related to the material world, and therefore they are more fundamental than the Lagrange function, the derivation of which in physics is based on the spatial representation of our material world.
4. Since information is an additive quantity, we believe that the closed information received by the system should be an additive addition to the Lagrange function of the system when it receives open information, so that the condition 1 is satisfied. That is, we will look for the Lagrange function in the form
Lfull = Lphys + Lc-inf.
(1)
where Lfull is the full Lagrangian function of the system.
Lphys. is the ordinary Lagrangian function of the system upon receiving public information.
Lc-inf. is the additive term to the Lagrangian function caused by the cryptographic information interaction.
In this form, when the cryptographic information interaction tends to zero, the full Lagrangian function of the system transforms into the ordinary Lagrangian function.
5. Since private information is transmitted using public information, the Lagrange function Lc-inf. must be somewhat similar to the Lagrange function of the material world Lphys.
The usual Lagrange function Lphys. for a free material point in non-relativistic mechanics has the form:
Lphys. = (min/2 ∙|v|∙|v|) ,
(2)
где min - inertial mass of a material point.
This form is derived from considerations of the homogeneity and isotropy of space and time. This is consistent with the cryptographic concept, since for open information, the world should appear identical to all observers. Note that when receiving closed information, space and time should no longer be isotropic and homogeneous, as a preferred direction emerges—the source from which the closed information was received.
Encrypted information is transmitted using public information. According to our cryptographic information concept, space and time are merely representations of public information. Therefore, there must be a one-to-one correspondence between public information and an object's coordinates. Consequently, we can differentiate unencrypted information by coordinates and time, since any change in public information about an object must cause a change in its coordinates.
Encrypted information cannot be represented in terms of space and time. In this case, there is no one-to-one correspondence, and therefore we cannot differentiate encrypted information by spatial coordinates and time. But encrypted information is transmitted using clear information. Consequently, the Lagrangian function of encrypted information Lc-inf must contain terms that can be differentiated by space and time, and those that cannot. But the Lagrangian of a free particle in both the nonrelativistic and relativistic cases depends only on the square of the velocity. There are no other parameters besides the velocity.
Therefore, we will attempt to write the Lagrangian function of crypto-information interaction Lc-inf for a free particle as:
Lc-inf = |v|∙ (ac-inf ∙ |v^|) .
(3)
Lc-inf It has the same form as the Lagrange function for open information (2), but in it the first factor describes the open information |v|, and accordingly this factor can be differentiated by space and time. And the second factor (ac-inf ∙|v^| ) describes the encrypted information, which cannot be differentiated by space and time. We mark this fact with the ^ symbol at the top of the factor (we chose this notation solely based on the possibilities available for formatting web pages on the Internet).
This strange differentiation rule is explained by the fact that the transmission of information in the case of crypto-information interaction is transmitted using the three-pass Shamir protocol.
A more mathematically correct derivation of this rule is possible only if we know the encryption algorithm used by nature. But to construct a phenomenological theory, we formulate this rule based on general considerations and intuitive insights.